![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Firm Overview Attorneys Practice Areas Practice Alerts BCM CLE BCM Trial Results Venues Contact Us Home |
Practice AlertsNew Case Law: Radosevich v. IC - Interest on Awardshttp://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/Work... This opinion is a long read, especially the convoluted procedural history, including a prior remand. The first part deals with an employer getting slammed with attorneys fees for not paying an arbitration award in full within 30 days, despite its claim that it was trying to negotiate a lump-sum settlement. The circuit court further found that this refusal to pay subjected the employer to additional attorneys fees under Section 19(g) (the provision for judicial enforcement of Commission awards.) The appellate court affirmed all of this. Next, the appellate court addressed the issue of interest. The arbitration award consisted of TTD and PTD that accrued prior to arbitration, as well as future PTD, maintenance, and home healthcare to be paid in fixed monthly amounts after the arbitration. No review was taken to the Commission. The 19(g) proceedings were filed one month after the arbitration decision became final. The employer made partial payments of the award over the next six months, but never did pay any interest prior to the circuit court's judgment. The judgment order included Section 19(n) interest on the benefits that accrued prior to arbitration. This interest was calculated for the period between the arbitration decision and the entry of the court judgment. However, the court applied interest under the Code of Civil Procedure Section 2-1303 on the weekly/monthly benefits payable after arbitration but prior to the circuit court judgment, up until the date of actual payment. On appeal, the claimant argued that Section 2-1303 interest should apply to the entire award entered by the arbitrator beginning the date that the award became final. The respondent agreed with the circuit court's calculation. The appellate court had to answer a few questions: Was section 19(n) interest chargeable to the benefits that were not payable until after the arbitration award? Past decisions of the court indicated this was not the case. However, the court now has stated:
I take that as a reversal of Ballard and Folks. Therefore, interest does now accrue even though the benefits were not due until after arbitration. The next question: When does Section 19(n) interest end and Section 2-1303 interest begin? The court stated that in 19(g) proceedings the 2-1303 interest is retroactive to the date the arbitration award became final. This holding was based on the language of 2-1303:
Because this changed the amount of interest liability, the case was remanded (again) for further determination of interest by the circuit court. Please note that this is different from the situation where the Commission decision is appealed to the circuit court under Section 19(f). In that case, the 19(n) interest continues until the the date the circuit court decision is entered. The 2-1303 interest then begins after the circuit court decision, and is not retroactive. |
![]() |